A Critique of Frege on Common Nouns

TitleA Critique of Frege on Common Nouns
Publication TypeJournal Article
AuthorsBen-Yami, H.
Journal titleRatio
Year2006
Pages148 - 155
Volume19
Issue2
Abstract

Frege analyzed the grammatical subject-term ‘S’ in quantified subject-predicate sentences, ‘q S are P’, as being logically predicative. This is in contrast to Aristotelian Logic, according to which it is a logical subject-term, like the proper name ‘a’ in ‘a is P’—albeit a plural one, designating many particulars. I show that Frege’s arguments for his analysis are unsound, and explain how he was misled to his position by the mathematical concept of function. If common nouns in this grammatical subject position are indeed logical subject-terms, this should require a thorough reevaluation of the adequacy of Frege’s predicate calculus as a tool for the analysis of the logic and semantics of natural language.

Languageeng
Notes

exported from refbase (http://www.bibliography.ceu.hu/show.php?record=7031), last updated on Thu, 12 Nov 2009 19:48:23 +0100

Publisher linkhttp://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=20908242&site=ehost-live
File attachment: